The founder of a British climate change activism group says sheâs making the choice not to have children because she fears the droughts, famine, flooding and extreme heat of the world they will have to live in.
Blythe Pepino, who lives in London, went public with her pledge not to have biological children at the end of 2018. has since amassed more than 450 similar vows, with 80 per cent coming from women, says Pepino.
âFor me, personally, itâs about me being able to put my time and resources into activism at the moment,â she told CTVâs Your Morning on Monday.
âIâm lucky enough to have a certain amount of power in this world. Iâm white and privileged and I donât have any children. I donât have any dependents. And really, this next few years is really, really important in terms of trying to put pressure on our governments to make the big changes that we need for our survival.â
Pepino says she made the difficult decision not to give birth after the warned last year that the window to prevent catastrophic climate change on Earth is just 11 years.
She said when she fell in love with her partner two years ago she wanted to have children with him. But when she learned about the UN report and did more research on her own, she found there was âsomething bigger and more important to do than being a mother at this time.â
Pepino, a 33-year-old singer and activist, says sheâs been surprised by the number of people who have joined her movement and how international the support has been.
âSome people will think itâs not a huge number, 450 people, whoâve signed up so far, but if you take into consideration how much of a taboo this kind of thing is and how political a statement weâre making, then I think itâs reflective of a much larger number.â
While some in the BirthStrike movement want to prevent bringing children and their descendents into the world to offset the emissions they would add to the climate change crisis, Pepino says BirthStrikeâs platform is not about reducing human population.
Climate change will lead to âbillions of deathsâ all on its own, she says.
A in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America found that even a rapid transition to a worldwide one-child policy would result in a population similar to todayâs by 2100. In other words, population control will not solve climate change by itself.
Pepino says she fully supports that view.
Instead, Pepino says she fears bringing children into a world of wildfires, drought and food shortages that scientists warn is coming without âmassive change in all aspects of human life.â
She says that will require systemic and widespread political change to unite humanity to fight climate change.
âReally, what we need is a change of our ideology. You know, the world of humans is being run by people who believe in constant growth and believe in ignoring the limitations of the natural world. And thatâs why weâve reached this point.â
There are 7.3 billion people on Earth now and the UN estimates that will reach 8.6 billion by 2030 and 11 billion by 2100.
On its website, BirthStrike declares: âBirthStrike stands in compassionate solidarity with all parents, celebrates their choice and doesn't seek to judge anyone intending to bear children. BirthStrike disagrees with prioritizing population control over system change in regards to tackling the environmental crisis, disagrees with any enforced population control measures and recognizes the colonial violence of such measures having been proposed in the past and present.â
Researchers at the University of British Columbia concluded in a that having fewer children is the single best decision an individual in a developing country can make to reduce greenhouse gases.
The researchers found that having one fewer children drastically outweighed other choices â eating a plant-based diet, avoiding air travel and giving up personal vehicles.
Author David Wallace-Wells warns in the terrifying 2019 best seller âThe Uninhabitable Earthâ that rising global temperatures will bring unbreathable air, famine, unbearable heat, extreme weather, uncontrolled wildfires, and cities under water. The effects could be felt by todayâs teenagers, he says.
His book opens: âIt is worse, much worse, than you think.â